Collective agreements are least common where workers need them most

Collective agreements are least common where workers need them most
Bargaining coverage over time. Credit: Rockwool Foundation Berlin

Workers earning the lowest wages are the least likely to be covered by collective agreements in Germany, despite being the group for whom these protections are arguably most important. In 2021, only 34% of workers in the lowest wage decile were covered by collective agreements, compared with more than 60% of workers in the middle of the wage distribution, according to findings of a new report by the ROCKWOOL Foundation Berlin (RFBerlin) and the Institute for Employment Research (IAB) in Nuremberg.

"Collective bargaining coverage has long been a central pillar of balanced wage development in Germany," says Christian Dustmann, director of RFBerlin and professor at University College London. "The decline in collective bargaining coverage—particularly among low-wage workers—raises significant questions about the future role of the collective bargaining system."

These findings are linked to a long-term decline in collective bargaining coverage in Germany. While around 68% of employees were covered by collective agreements in 2000, this figure had fallen to just 49% by 2023.

Collective agreements have traditionally played a key role in reducing wage disparities and strengthening employees' bargaining position vis-à-vis employers. However, when collective bargaining coverage is lowest among those earning the least, these protective mechanisms become less effective.

"The very low level of collective bargaining coverage in the low-wage sector is particularly striking," says Bernd Fitzenberger, director of the IAB. "It is precisely where employees have the least bargaining power that collective bargaining coverage is low." Co-author Lutz Bellmann of the IAB adds, "This poses a key challenge for the German model of industrial relations."

This also helps explain why the statutory minimum wage has become increasingly important since its introduction in 2015. For many low-income workers, it now partly replaces the protective function previously more commonly provided by collective agreements.

The impact of collective agreements extends beyond companies that are formally bound by them. Many companies voluntarily align with the standards established in collective agreements, even though they are not legally bound by them. When these companies are also taken into account, effective collective agreement coverage rises to around 68% of employees.

More information

Report: Who Is Left Out? Collective Bargaining and Low-Wage Workers in Germany

Provided by Rockwool Foundation Berlin

Who's behind this story?

Lisa Lock

Lisa Lock

BA art history, MA material culture. Former museum editor, paramedic, and transplant coordinator. Editing for Science X since 2021. Full profile →

Andrew Zinin

Andrew Zinin

Master's in physics with research experience. Long-time science news enthusiast. Plays key role in Science X's editorial success. Full profile →

Citation: Collective agreements are least common where workers need them most (2026, July 10) retrieved 11 July 2026 from https://phys.org/news/2026-07-agreements-common-workers.html

This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.