on
Unhoused people and wildlife are increasingly coming into contact. Here's what can be done to protect them
As homelessness increases around the world, more unhoused people are turning to parks and other urban green spaces to seek shelter. However, these places are also home to animals that live in and around urban areas.
This sets the stage for potentially dangerous interactions between humans and urban wildlife such as coyotes. Unhoused people face the risk of contracting disease from wild animals, while animals can be displaced by human presence.
Recent work by my colleagues and me shows that this issue contributes to human-wildlife conflict, with important ecological and social consequences. To explore conflict between homeless communities and urban wildlife, we focused on coyotes in Edmonton. The paper is published in the journal Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment.
One of the most successful carnivores of the Anthropocene, coyotes thrive in cities. They have a remarkable capacity to live alongside humans, as well as an ability to get into trouble with people; conflict includes property damage, disease transmission, attacks on pets and, rarely, people.
Data we examined from the Edmonton Urban Coyote Project showed that the number of coyote conflict reports in the city was increasing. These include interactions in which coyotes intimidated, approached or attacked humans or their pets.
Key to our work were the harsh winter conditions in Edmonton. Consistent snowfall transforms the city into a canvas that records the details of coyote life, which can be read footprint by footprint, telling us what they eat and where they go to find safety.
Cold temperatures also encourage people sleeping outdoors to seek heated spaces, but unoccupied encampments remain highly visible. This combination allowed us to read the stories of human-wildlife interactions in the snow while respecting human privacy.
Three forms of conflict
Competition: Tracking showed that people experiencing homelessness and coyotes often used the same areas. This makes sense—both seek secure areas, far from major trails, where disturbance is less likely.
Competition between people and wildlife does not require people and animals to be in the same place at the same time. For example, in winter, coyotes dig dens into the abandoned sleeping platforms of unhoused people. In spring, people experiencing homelessness damage coyote dens.
Food: Those experiencing homelessness may not be able to secure their food or dispose of trash. Areas surrounding encampments are often littered with food remains. Such refuse becomes an easy meal for opportunistic coyotes.
Human food represents a considerable health risk for wildlife. Wild animals that eat human food are more often diseased and can become food conditioned—a process by which wild animals associate people with food, alongside a suite of behavioral and physiological changes that extend all the way to the gut microbiome. Across species, conflict behaviors are especially difficult to reverse among food-conditioned animals.
Disease: Wherever animals spend time, poop accumulates. This is especially true for species like coyotes, who use scat to communicate. Scat is often left on or near food items—including those found in encampments—and on visually prominent objects, such as litter. We often found coyote scat in and near abandoned encampments.
Contact with coyote scat can cause serious disease in humans. As scat breaks down in the weather and is even fed on by birds, it becomes part of the soil, but infectious microscopic agents persist.
In Edmonton, up to half the coyotes carry Echinococcus multilocularis—a tapeworm that causes alveolar echinococcosis in humans. This infectious disease is often fatal. By sleeping in scat-strewn green spaces, often without access to hygiene facilities and with difficulties accessing health care, people experiencing homelessness face increased exposure to this (and other) parasite carried by wildlife.
What should we do about it?
The ideal solution is to end homelessness and the factors that cause it. In North America, the single biggest predictor of homelessness is the relationship between income and housing ability; narrowing this gap would benefit both people and wildlife.
Knowing that wildlife threaten a vulnerable human community may lead some to propose wildlife eradication. Evidence from coyotes and other species shows that eradication efforts usually fail, often accruing a large price tag, undercutting ecosystem services and destabilizing animal populations, leading to increased conflict behavior.
So what are some feasible, short-term interventions that could alleviate conflict given ongoing homelessness and persistent urban wildlife?
First, there must be more research that involves ecologists, social scientists, medical professionals and people who have experienced homelessness. Diverse teams are best able to tackle challenges that lie at the interface of people and wildlife, research and practice.
Second, direct support to those experiencing homelessness could alleviate some imminent threats to their well-being. The form this support takes should depend on local context.
Finally, health care professionals and those who work closely with homeless communities should be familiar with local diseases carried by wildlife, their symptoms and the risk factors that affect this community. Doing so represents a small step toward increased access to health care.
It is easy to overlook that cities are ecosystems where both people and wildlife live. Differing privileges, opportunities and discrimination all affect how people relate to urban nature. Our work shows that human-wildlife conflict is shaped by these inequalities.
Fostering human-wildlife coexistence in cities is bigger and more complicated than wildlife management in isolation. If we want to build cities that are healthier for both people and wildlife, we must recognize social inequality as an ecological force and create systems that prevent the circumstances that foster conflict.
Publication details
Sage Raymond et al, Potential for conflict between urban coyotes and people experiencing unsheltered homelessness, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment (2026). DOI: 10.1002/fee.70053
Who's behind this story?
MA in English, copy editor since 2021 with experience in higher education and health content. Dedicated to trustworthy science news. Full profile →
Master's in physics with research experience. Long-time science news enthusiast. Plays key role in Science X's editorial success. Full profile →
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
Citation: Unhoused people and wildlife are increasingly coming into contact. Here's what can be done to protect them (2026, July 15) retrieved 16 July 2026 from https://phys.org/news/2026-07-unhoused-people-wildlife-contact.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.