YouTube Raised Its Monetization Bar. Some Filmmakers Do Not Rely On It

The YouTube Shorts (Photo by Nikolas Kokovlis/NurPhoto via Getty Images).

NurPhoto via Getty Images

YouTube announced on Monday the first significant changes to its YouTube Partner Program, or YPP, since 2018. From February 1, 2027, new applicants will need 8,000 qualified watch hours over the previous 365 days, or 20 million qualified Shorts views over the previous 90 days, to share in advertising and Premium subscription revenue. Both figures are double YouTube’s current thresholds. The subscriber requirement remains 1,000.

Most of the response has focused on what a higher bar does to emerging creators. It leaves another question open: what if that revenue was never the reason for being on the platform?

A studio and two independent filmmakers I spoke to largely agree on where YouTube’s value sits. They do not agree on whether raising the threshold is a problem.

New Creators And Shorts Channels Face Different Thresholds

There are two changes, and they are easy to conflate.

New YouTube Partner Program applicants will need the doubled thresholds to unlock advertising and Premium revenue sharing. YouTube says creators already in the program will not be affected, while its lower entry tier for fan funding and Shopping remains unchanged.

Separately, channels will need 10 million qualified Shorts views over the previous 90 days to receive advertising and subscription revenue from Shorts. Channels below that threshold remain in YPP and can continue earning from long-form videos. Shorts revenue sharing resumes automatically once they cross it again. YouTube says the aim is to reward creators who drive conversation and engagement, and that creators already earning significant revenue from Shorts are unlikely to be affected.

MORE FOR YOU

Gabriel Alin Zainescu set out the practical consequences for marketers this week.

ForbesYouTube Doubles The Monetization Bar For New CreatorsBy Gabriel Alin Zainescu

For Wonder Studios, YouTube Is About Reach Before Revenue

Wonder Studios treats YouTube primarily as a place to find an audience and test demand rather than as a source of production income.

Xavier Collins of Wonder Studios said in an email exchange that YouTube has always been about “top of funnel and building IP in public / reaching new audiences than monetisation.” Traction is “an important metric in helping us identify those stories,” he said, but “less critical from a monetisation standpoint.”

Collins said many independent creators do depend on YouTube revenue and that he hopes the changes will not affect them adversely.

The Audience Is The Asset, Not The Advertising Revenue

The filmmaker Ikenna Mokwe, of OnGen, is not in YPP. He publishes short-form work to YouTube, TikTok and Instagram and said in an email exchange that none of it earns him money directly.

“It works as a shop window,” he said. “People see the work and then come to me about making something new.” Commissions have followed. Advertising revenue was never part of his calculation.

Mokwe said he would take advertising money if it came, but sees it as a bonus rather than the destination. His longer-term aim is to own the relationship with his audience and bring people somewhere he controls.

The filmmaker Kavan Cardoza describes similar economics from another position. Sponsors and partners are where the revenue sits, he said in an email exchange, with YouTube introducing them to an audience. For smaller loyal followings, he points to services such as Patreon.

“The power in building an audience on YouTube carries a lot of weight, and that is where the value lies,” he said.

His own series, The Chronicles of Bone, runs without advertising. In a video call on August 7, Cardoza says he avoids YouTube advertising revenue because he reads the platform’s guidelines as requiring content suitable for all audiences and does not want to risk strikes on a show that plainly is not.

That pattern is not universal. Nate Stone, cofounder and chief executive of DittoDub, which sells dubbing tools to creators, said in an email exchange that YPP is the core of the business for some creators and a minor line for others, and that subscriber count does not predict which. “A bigger channel is not automatically less sensitive to a change in YPP revenue,” he said.

Stone raised the commercial conflict himself. DittoDub benefits when creators reach more people, and he said the company works with creators including KSI, John Nellis, Topper Guild and Erling Haaland.

Asked to substantiate the growth Stone attributes to localization, he ran a fresh study and supplied its method: a random sample of 150 channels drawn from creators who dubbed their existing catalog and kept adding dubbed audio to new releases, using an average of 26 languages, measured over the three months after they began.

It found a median increase of 4.79 times in views and 5.72 times in subscribers, against means of 9.49 and 10.29. The figures are DittoDub’s own, drawn from a cohort chosen for creators who committed to dubbing rather than tested it, and compare each channel against its own earlier performance rather than against a control group. Forbes has not independently verified them.

ForbesWonder Studios Wants To Turn AI Short Films Into The Next Big IPBy Maureen Kerr

The Threshold Is Where They Part Company

Mokwe said the rolling test will not change how he builds an audience, but objects to what he thinks it rewards. Ten million views over 90 days is, in his reading, an incentive to publish more frequently.

“Generating a clip now takes minutes, but working out what’s actually worth making takes as long as it ever did,” he said.

He acknowledges the counterargument: views represent an audience choosing to watch. But “being watched and being wanted aren’t quite the same thing,” he said, particularly when recommendation systems determine what appears in feeds.

“If your income depends on a threshold a platform can move, the platform owns the relationship, not you,” Mokwe said.

Cardoza reads the change differently. Given YouTube’s growth, he said, the higher thresholds make sense. They would not alter how he advises filmmakers on self-distribution. YouTube, he said, is still the place to go.

Stone put the difference between them in terms of where a channel sits. For channels comfortably above 10 million Shorts views the rule may barely register, he said. “It matters most at the edge. Near the line, a slow stretch can determine whether a creator earns from the general Shorts pool that month.”

He said he understood why YouTube would reward sustained recent viewing rather than one old viral run, but shared Mokwe’s concern about what a rolling target does to the work. If the safest way to stay eligible is to repeat whatever worked last month, he said, experimentation becomes harder and Shorts becomes more repetitive.

YouTube Is Adding More Ways To Earn Beyond Ads

The announcement is not simply a tightening of advertising access.

For channels below the 10 million Shorts threshold, YouTube plans incentives around Shopping, brand deals and starting or growing trends. Details have not yet been announced.

The YouTube Partner Program Is Growing, But Ad Access Is Narrowing

YouTube says more than 3 million creators are in YouTube Partner Program and expects to pay creators more in 2027 than in 2026. Both can be true while access to advertising and Premium revenue becomes harder for some creators.

Neither Mokwe nor Cardoza expects February’s changes to alter how they work.

The thresholds decide who gets paid by YouTube. They do not decide whether YouTube is valuable.